Category Archives: firearms

Frugal Firearms Podcast – Part 2

The second part of my blathering on Frugal Firearms is up.

https://rss.com/podcasts/frugalfirearmspodcast/3228377/

The little Bauer .25 autoloader came up in the discussion. I haven’t shot mine in years so I broke it out and shot it yesterday. That was definitely a ‘gun whisperer’ exercise.

The Course of Fire I used was the New York State Concealed Carry License Live-Fire Proficiency Assessment.

The New York target is three sheets of paper in landscape mode stacked vertically. This is very similar in size to an FBI Q target. That seemed very generous to me so I used only one sheet of paper.

I managed to pass it several times. In fact, I never managed to fail it. Although many people will scoff at this Assessment as a marksmanship test, it is a workable Firing Solution for over 80% of the Armed Citizen incidents in my database. Oh, the horror!

Frugal Firearms Podcast – Part I

We had fun talking about Little Crappy Pistols, among other things, on Frugal Firearms.

There was a long list of topics and we ended up going much longer so the podcast is in two parts. Here’s Part I

https://rss.com/podcasts/frugalfirearmspodcast/3213813

When Part 2 is up, I’ll post the link.

Serious Mistakes Gunowners Make Link Updates

Some of the links to Serious Mistakes Gunowners Make have become unworkable over the years. The buttons have the current link and take my readers directly to the sources.

For those who aren’t familiar with it, here are some reviews.

Reviews

GAT Daily https://gatdaily.com/articles/claude-werner-serious-mistakes-gun-owners-make/

Pistol Training dot com https://pistol-training.com/serious-mistakes-gunowners-make/

KR Training https://blog.krtraining.com/book-review-serious-mistakes-gunowners-make-werner-2019/

CCW Safe Podcasts Discussing concepts in the book

AI tells me:

The most common ‘complaint’ from reviewers is actually a compliment to the content: several prominent reviewers expressed disappointment that it is strictly sold as a digital file (PDF/eBook).

I’m working on a print edition but it may take a little time.

Thanks for all the support my readers have given me over the years, it means a lot.

If you would like to read more in-depth articles about self-defense and personal protection, please consider subscribing to my Patreon page.

https://www.patreon.com/TacticalProfessor

Reasonable Proficiency

#fridayfundamentals

This question was posed to me as a possible discussion point for an upcoming podcast.

“Do people train adequately to a point of reasonable proficiency with their firearms? If not, what sort of drills would help them develop while being sufficiently interesting to keep them engaged?”

The note I wrote to myself for the discussion was as follows:

Let’s define “reasonable proficiency.” I often hear the FBI Qualification, which I consider elitist nonsense and ridiculous. My two favorite assessments are the New York State Concealed Carry License Live-Fire Proficiency Assessment and the San Diego County (California) CCW Practical Qualification.

New York is five rounds at 4 yards. San Diego is 5 rounds at each of 7, 5, and 3 yards. San Diego requires Primary Hand Only and Support Hand Only shooting at 3 yards. The two total 20 rounds. New York’s standard is four of the five shots must hit a silhouette target. San Diego’s standard is 13 of the 15 shots must hit a silhouette target. An Armed Citizen who simply shot those to standard once a quarter would prove formidable in a confrontation.

The ability to put five shots, or less, onto a criminal attacker at a range of three to seven yards will solve almost every incident in my database. There are exceptions but they represent fewer than one percent.

Let’s not overthink our expectations of newer or less experienced gunowners. All that does is intimidate and discourage them. Keeping inexperienced shooters engaged starts out by having a little empathy for where they are at in the process and remembering where we all started.

When the podcast goes live, I’ll post a link.

If you would like to read more in-depth articles about self-defense and personal protection, please consider subscribing to my Patreon page.

https://www.patreon.com/TacticalProfessor

Another thought about Dot Sights ‘and more’

#fridayfundmentals

Several articles in Greg Ellifritz’s Weekend Knowledge Dump https://www.activeresponsetraining.net/weekend-knowledge-dump-september-18-2026 are very relevant to Friday Fundamentals today.

Fretting About Pistol Red-Dot Zeroes Is Silly

https://gatdaily.com/articles/fretting-about-pistol-red-dot-zeroes-is-silly

“It’s crazy to think about the fact that we’re discussing differences in points of impact between 1 and 1 ½ inches. These are tiny measurements in considering everything else pertaining to handgun shooting. In fact, think about how even proficient shooters would likely struggle to consistently shoot a “100” on a standard NRA B-8 target with a typical red-dot equipped pistol. And the 10-ring on a B-8 is 3.36 inches in diameter!”

This mirrors my thoughts about the worries folks have expressed about the non-adjustability of the Ruger ReadyDot sight. When I mounted it on a SCCY Gen 3, the Point of Impact had diverged from the X Ring Point of Aim into the 9 ring of a B-27 target at 10 yards. Would this make the slightest difference when shooting a concealed carry qualification test or in an actual Personal Protection incident? I doubt it.

You Can Improve Your Shooting Almost Anywhere…Even At An Indoor Range

https://www.shootingwire.com/features/2026/09/you-can-improve-your-shooting-almost-anywhereeven-at-an-indoor-range/index.html

Years ago, the Tactical Professor did his annoying little numbery thing and determined that in the Atlanta metro area, 999 out of 1,000 gunowners only have access to an indoor range to practice. And Atlanta has a lot of outdoor gun clubs compared to most metro areas. The hitch is that you have to be a member or know a member to shoot at one. My club has a several year waiting list.

Gunowners who want to develop even a modicum of proficiency have to learn how to do that on their own at an indoor range. That’s the underlying concept for my book Indoor Range Practice Sessions. https://store.payloadz.com/details/2501143-ebooks-education-indoor-range-practice-sessions.html

It’s also why most of the articles in my 2024 Shooting Illustrated series are most of the articles in my 2024 Shooting Illustrated series are oriented toward an indoor range (i.e., resource constrained) environment. https://www.shootingillustrated.com/content/near-to-far-marksmanship-practice/ There are almost a dozen articles, one per month. After a year of one practice session per month, a gunowner will have some degree of proficiency.

As President Theodore Roosevelt said:

“Do what you can, with what you’ve got, where you are.”

https://www.theodorerooseveltcenter.org/quote/do-what-you-can-with-what-youve-got-where-you-are

Related to this is my rebuttal of “Everyone needs to get training.” Looking at the number of available facilities and instructors, it would take nearly 100 years to put every US gunowner through an equivalent of the NRA Basics Of Pistol Shooting course. The time it would take to put everyone through the equivalent of the NRA Personal Protection In The Home course isn’t even worth calculating.

This analysis was done over 10 years ago before the big boom in gun purchases during the past decade, so the situation is probably much more difficult now. Gunownership is way up and facilities are being put out of business on a weekly basis.

People are strange

When you’re a stranger

https://onherownlife.substack.com/p/people-are-strange

The title is a play on the song by The Doors

As the late WT Aprill often said, “They are not like you.” Don’t assume that people are going to be grateful for your help. Some will, some won’t. Understand there’s risk in helping others.

My Patreon is Graduate level study of Personal Protection. It’s not for everyone but some people really like it.

https://www.patreon.com/TacticalProfessor

9/2 Challenge

To keep my blood pressure down from the malfeasance of the NYC administration, I shot the Langdon Tactical 9/2 Challenge yesterday. There are two videos, one First Person Shooter. and the other 3rd person perspective. It’s a good drill and I enjoyed shooting it.

Here is the First Person Shooter. The 3rd person perspective is linked in the end screen.

I like to think of it as practicing the destruction of the enemies of our great Nation. My BP was only 117/71 this morning so I guess it worked.

The Langdon Tactical webpage with more information about the Challenge is here.

5 + 1 Drill

#fridayfundamentals

Last night’s IDPA match at Johns Creek Indoor Gun Range concluded with a Standards stage. It was a simple drill that we can call 5+1. Some variation of this drill is the last stage of every match there. It began loaded with five rounds and an available reload of at least two rounds. Since I was shooting my Model 65 revolver, I used a full speedloader for the reload. A single IDPA target was placed at 7 yards.

The drill was to: draw and fire four shots to the body, one shot to the head, reload, and fire one more shot to the head.

The drill is timed and scored. Although it seems simple on the surface, it includes a number of marksmanship components.

  1. Draw to a good first shot
  2. Three splits (successive shots to the same target, in this case the eight inch – 0 zone of the body)
  3. A transition (shot to a different target, in this case the four inch – 0 zone of the head)
  4. A reload
  5. One shot to a precision target (in this case the four inch – 0 zone of the head)
  6. Follow through on the last shot

It also requires the shooter to remember the drill while being timed. This may seem straightforward but every match several shooters make some kind of Procedural Error, such as shooting too many shots, forgetting where the shots are supposed to go, or riding the slide stop so the slide doesn’t lock back. Not having the slide lock back doesn’t incur a Procedural Penalty but if you look at the gun for a bit before initiating the reload, there’s additional time on your score.

For many shooters, the trip ups come at three places; the first shot, the shot after the reload, and following through on the last shot. Missing the first shot is the single most common marksmanship error. Missing the first shot after a stoppage clearance, e.g., a reload, is the second most missed shot. Not following through after the last shot is the source of many dropped shots.

Those two shots, first and first after a reload, require the shooter to ‘Shoot better,’ as Bill Rogers https://rogersshootingschool.com/ says it. It’s easy to let the trigger finger get ahead of the sights but that’s a mistake. In 1893, Theodore Roosevelt, the 26th President of the United States, wrote in his book The Wilderness Hunter:

“No possible rapidity of fire can atone for habitual carelessness of aim with the first shot.”

Some concepts are timeless, regardless of what gun you’re shooting or what sighting system it has on it.

Ill-Annoy Practice Session and Tune-up

#wheelgunwednesday

I’m going to shoot my Model 65 tomorrow at an indoor IDPA match, so I did a little practice and tune-up yesterday. The Ill-Annoy Concealed Carry License Qualification is a nice little tune-up vehicle. Good thing I did because the locally procured reloaded ammunition didn’t perform 100%. Remington UMC 130 gr ball is 100%. Testing one’s equipment is always a good idea.

If you would like to read more in-depth articles about self-defense and personal protection, please consider subscribing to my Patreon page.

https://www.patreon.com/TacticalProfessor

Silhouette Torture

#22Tuesday

Decades ago, David Blinder created a 50 round drill for focused practice loosely based on Dot Drill 101 from the Brian Enos Forum. The late Todd Louis Green, who founded pistol-training.com, expanded on it, and codified it into a practice session containing most relevant defensive pistol marksmanship skills. He called it Dot Torture and put it up on the pistol-training forum.

ETA comment from Simon Golub of Pistol-Training

Dot Torture came to us as is. We simply photocopied the target and Todd liked it a lot, giving Blinder the correct credit on the target. –Simon

ETA 2 from the source, David Blinder, himself

I got shooting dots from John Shaw at Mid-South which I believe he got from IPSC. I am also the one who named it dot torture. Todd did some modifications and definitely popularized it.

I’ve made my own version of it using the target employed for the Swiss Concealed Carry License live fire test. Today was an opportunity to shoot it with my LCP II .22. It was fun. A .22 understudy for your carry pistol is a concept that can be very useful. Shooting .22s is inexpensive and has some benefits that centerfires don’t have, minimal recoil and Over Pressure Event being the principal ones.

The demanding nature of the target requires the shooter to know the zero of their pistol very well at whatever distance is being used. In the case of the LCP .22, at three yards the hold was about halfway up on the white circle in the chest of the silhouette.

I recently mounted a Ruger ReadyDot on my Taurus TX22 Compact. https://thetacticalprofessor.net/2026/08/03/readydot-on-tx22-compact/ It zeroes quite well at both 10 and 20 yards.

Although I started to shoot Silhouette Torture with it today, rain set in and I wasn’t able to finish. I was able to shoot it enough to learn that the hold at five yards was on the head. The 15 MOA dot completely covers the head at that distance but it’s not hard to hold. Knowing your pistol’s zero at different ranges, whether using iron or Dot sights is useful.

The Silhouette Torture target is attached. Its instructions are on the 2nd page of the 2 page PDF.

My Red Dot Adventure series is available on my Patreon page for those who are interested in exploring what Dot Sights can and cannot do.

https://www.patreon.com/TacticalProfessor

ReadyDot on TX22 Compact

#mousegunmonday

As an experiment, I installed a Ruger ReadyDot on a Taurus TX22 Compact. The efficacy of this combination was surprising. Although the ReadyDot’s zero cannot be adjusted, Point of Impact was really close to Point of Aim at both 20 and 10 yards.

Body shots at 20 yards from a benchrest and headshots at 10 yards offhand were the test for zero used. No complaints whatsoever.

At 20 yards, the dot perfectly covers the four inch circle on the body of the target. For me, this made it very easy to aim without over-aiming. At 10 yards, it is slightly smaller than the head circle. Once again, I found this advantageous. This intrigued me so I shot the IDPA 5X5 Classifier. I didn’t time it but still shot at my normal cadence. Two Points Down.

I’ve created a drill I call the McGee, Shootist, Big Iron Challenge. It is a combination of the McGee Paradigm (3/3/3), Wild Bill Hickok’s shootist test from the American Mercury article about him, and Marty Robbins’ song Big Iron. The Challenge tests marksmanship at three separate distances; 3 yards, 8 yards Primary Hand Only, and 13 yards. It is 18 rounds total, six shots at each distance. In terms of proxemics https://thetacticalprofessor.net/2014/10/16/situational-awareness-and-positioning-part-iii/, marksmanship in the far phase of Social Space, and the near and far phases of Public Space are assessed.

McGee’s Challenge consists of three strings at three yards. One shot from the holster, two shots from the MidPoint, and three shots from Low Ready. The time limit for each string is three seconds. The standard is all six shots in the USPSA Metric target A zone in the head (2 inches x 4 inches).

The Shootist’s Challenge https://thetacticalprofessor.net/2024/08/02/gunfighter-challenge/ comes from the standard Wild Bill Hickok used in the Old West to see if a shooter was ‘good.’

The Big Iron Challenge was inspired by Marty Robbins’ song Big Iron.

“There was 40 feet between them when they stopped to make their play.”

The Big Iron Challenge consists of six shots at 40 feet/13 yards. It’s shot with Two Hands, Untimed. The standard is all six shots must hit in an eight circle, the IDPA -0 body zone.

The TX22/ReadyDot performed well on the Challenge. I’m very pleased with this combination of gun and dot.

Last Thursday, I shot an IDPA match that had a Pick Up Gun theme. I provided the TX22 Compact with the iron sights for one stage. Fifteen shooters fired six rounds each without any malfunctions. The match combined with the ReadyDot test totaled 143 rounds with no malfunctions. MiniMag solids were the ammunition used. This confirms my experience that the TX22 is a very reliable gun when fed decent ammo.

FTC Note and author disclosure: I purchased everything used in these experiments; gun, holster, ammunition, sight, and targets, with my own money. I receive no compensation whatsoever for anything mentioned.

More of my Red Dot Adventures are chronicled on my Patreon page. For those who are considering putting a Red Dot Sight on their pistols, I’m exploring my testing criteria and outcomes, both yea and nay.

https://www.patreon.com/TacticalProfessor